Background
It has been estimated that some 3 x 109 years ago, blue-green algae
appeared and there went the environment, so to speak. Up to that time it is
likely that oxygen existed only in oxides. We now live in an atmosphere
consisting of a 21 percent oxygen radical or diradical, to be correct.
Since the time of Lavoisier, Priestly, and Scheele, the pioneers in oxygen
research, a vast literature related to oxygen has emerged. For instance,
there have been nearly 131,000 papers on oxygen published since 1968. That
was the year that McCord and Fridovich1 demonstrated that certain enzymes
liberated the superoxide radical. Within the next decade, McCord2
demonstrated that radicals induce damage and scavenging enzymes protect
against such damage; Chance, Sies and Boveris3 published a
seminal review on hydroperoxide metabolism; and Vladimirov et al.4
summarized their work on radicalinduced membrane peroxidation. Such
breakthroughs attracted new workers from a wide array of disciplines to
the emerging topic of oxidative stress and antioxidant protection.
The enormous amount of subsequent research caused Forster and Estabrook5 to suggest that it is proper to conceive of oxygen as an essential nutrient that presents us with problems of malnutrition and overnutrition.
Analysis Methods
The principal difficulty in trying to study free radical events in biological
systems rests in the fleetingly short life times of radicals and reactive
species. Chance et al.3 quote Warburg as saying,"Wieland has
processed whole dogs and not found one drop of H2O2!" The problem was not the inability to detect H2O2 but the failure to realize how rapidly it was degraded in biological systems. It is essential to keep that point in mind when designing research related to oxidative stress.
Radicals themselves exist for only a brief time, and their observation and characterization are limited to various techniques involving a special spectrometer capable of determining electron spin resonance (ESR), also known as electron paramagnetic resonance. The application of ESR to biological samples is fraught with complications. For instance, aqueous solutions have a high dielectric absorption of microwave energy. Investigators have resorted to low-temperature techniques or the use of compounds known as spin traps in an attempt to overcome this problem. Furthermore, tissue preparation itself can generate radicals. These problems coupled with the method's inapplicability to in viva systems has resulted in its infrequent use in exercise-related radical studies.
Lacking a suitable method for direct observation of radicals, most investigators
have resorted to various "fingerprint" approaches to establishing that oxidative
stress reactions have occurred. One of the most frequently employed techniques
involves reacting samples with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in fluorometric or
spectrophotometric assays to establish what are often called TBARS for
thiobarbituric reaction products. Some investigators persist in referring
to this reaction as a measure of malondialdehyde (MDA), a reaction product
of lipid peroxidation. However, it is well known that TBA will react with
molecules other than MDA. MDA can be assayed directly by high-pressure
liquid chromatography (HPLC)6 or by gas chromatography.7 Often,
investigators have failed to detect a rise in plasma thiobarbituric acid
reactive substances (TBARS3 subsequent to exercise. Such an observation
does not necessarily indicate that oxidative stress has not occurred. We
have shown that TEARS is rapidly cleared from electrically stimulated
muscle and that rats fatigued by running showed a significant increase
in urinary TBARS.8