By Abigail W. Leonard
LiveScience, July 23
Straight to the Source
Nearly half a century after DDT was first dumped across acres of North
American farmland and three decades after it was banned in the United
States and Canada, the toxic pesticide still has damaging effects on
local species, according to a new study.
Robins
exposed to DDT before birth had damage to regions of the brain that
enable them to sing and protect territory. Both functions are integral
to mating and were more impaired in male robins, potentially leaving
them unable to attract females.
"This is the first study that documented a neural effect from DDT in
a natural population in any species," said Andrew Iwaniuk, a
post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Alberta and an
author of the study published in Behavioural Brain Research. The
majority of previous research focused on acute, rather than chronic
conditions and usually in controlled lab environments, he says.
Can't build a nest
The researchers collected eggs from a population of wild birds
and found that some had high levels of DDT, while others had no
exposure at all. After the birds hatched, they raised both groups in a
pesticide-free environment, then sacrificed them at two years to
examine their brain tissue.
The group that came in contact with the pesticide during development
had up to 30 percent less tissue in certain areas of the brain—and they
were unable to sing complicated songs, defend their territory or even
build nests properly.
The researchers aren't sure why some eggs had higher levels of DDT
than others, but they think that as mother robins forage for
earthworms, they pick up pesticides in the soil, some more than others.
Because eggs are rich in fat, they are perfect receptacles for
fat-soluble DDT. So as the mother feeds, the DDT is deposited in her
eggs. Brain tissue is also highly fatty, "so the DDT likes to hang out
there," Iwaniuk said.
Ongoing problem
Iwaniuk estimates that at least 15 to 20 generations of robins have
been affected since the pesticide was first applied. Because they live
in orchards where soil is not regularly aerated, he sees little hope
for change, at least in the near future.
As long as it remains there, DDT has the potential to impact a wide range of animals.
The researchers don't know how far up the food chain the toxin might
travel, but hawks and weasels that eat robins could potentially be at
risk as well. Iwaniuk says he is particularly concerned about
aboriginal populations that live in the area and subsist on natural
food sources.
Even for people who won't come in direct contact with DDT, Iwaniuk thinks there's a larger lesson here.
"Yes, it happened historically, but there are still problems with
pesticides," he says. "They have an extremely long half-life and just
because we use one today, that doesn't mean it will always be safe."