By Cheri Tips - Executive Director - National
Health Federation (NHF)
Thursday, May 10th, 2007
Note
- The NHF had two important objectives in this Ottawa meeting - (1)
keeping Genetically-Modified (GM) foods labeled as such, word-wide, and (2)
insuring that foods could make health claims. Despite fierce opposition
they accomplished both objectives. - Tim Bolen
The National Health Federation (NHF) has
International Nongovernmental Organization (INGO) observer status at all Codex
Alimentarius meetings and represents the interests of health-conscious
consumers. There were numerous countries and other INGOs present, interested
in various matters from labeling of genetically-modified foods to the labeling
of organic foods. Importantly, too, the subject of the FAO/WHO's Global
Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity, and Health was discussed.
The WHO Global Strategy
On
the opening day (April 30th) of the 35th Session of the Codex Committee on
Food Labeling here in Ottawa, Canada, Dr. Margaret Cheney of the World Health
Organization discussed, among other things, the amendment of the Purpose of
the Guidelines to allow the addition onto food labels of information that
would inform consumers as to which foods could help protect them from
noncommunicable diseases. If accepted by the Committee, this proposal would be
a major victory for the rights of consumers to be informed about certain
beneficial health information.
At Codex meetings, country members always get to
speak first and they did so with Mauritania, Costa Rica, and Canada speaking
up in favor of the FAO/WHO proposal. But, Korea, Mexico, Malaysia, Germany,
Brazil, Thailand, Switzerland, Indonesia, and of course the United States
spoke up against the proposed language.
Scott Tips, the NHF delegate, timed his remarks
so as to have the last word and the NHF was the only INGO delegation to speak
out on this issue. Mr. Tips said, "I am very surprised at the opposition
shown here today to the well-thought out proposal of the FAC and WHO to amend
the Purpose of the Guidelines so as to allow consumers to benefit from health
information that could protect them from communicable diseases. I can only
say that perhaps some here are influenced by pharmaceutical interests that
have a vested interest in a system that has failed for many years to cure
noncommunicable diseases. If anything, the Committee should amend the Purpose
of the Guidelines to also allow consumers to receive health information on
communicable diseases as well, since it is well-documented that, for example,
adequate selenium intake will significantly! reduce the risk of HIV infection
and adequate intake of Vitamin D will greatly reduce the risk of suffering
from the flu virus."